PRcheck asks the one question a senior reviewer would, right in the pull request. The author answers in the thread, PRcheck verifies it against the diff, and the check goes green.
GitHub App · Read-only · Non-blocking by default
Why does the consumer check for a previously seen message key before charging? What breaks if that check is removed?
Without the seen-key check, retries and duplicate deliveries can charge the same order twice. We mark the key after a successful charge so a second delivery is a no-op.
Saved to decision log · payments/consumer.ts
AI writes more of the code. Review becomes a rubber stamp. Three months later, nobody can explain the change.
of new code is now AI-generated.
Industry estimate, 2026
of developers use AI tools, but only 29% trust the output.
Developer survey, 2026
AI writes code faster than a human can read it.
Estimate, 2026
When the person who merged it can't explain it, that gap has a cost. It just doesn't show up until an incident.
Add the GitHub App to the repos you choose. Run it on every PR, AI-assisted PRs only, or critical paths.
PRcheck reads the diff and asks 1-2 questions about the decisions in it: the kind you can't answer without having thought about the change.
The author answers in the thread. PRcheck verifies the answer, sets the check, and stores the "why" in your decision log.
One metric for leadership. A trail of "why" for the team. No extra quizzes required.
One number for engineering leadership, trended weekly, especially for AI-generated changes.
72% → rising
Every verified answer, searchable, linked to the code it explains. Documentation that writes itself.
Who understands which parts of the codebase. Spot single points of failure before someone leaves.
New hires walk through critical modules using your team's own explanations from PR history.
PRcheck asks about trade-offs and consequences in your system ("what happens to the billing worker if this times out?"), not textbook facts.
Answers are checked against the diff and the surrounding code. And because the explanation lives in the PR thread, the team sees it. Gaming it is visible.
Show that a human understood every AI-written change you shipped.
New hires learn critical modules from your team's verified explanations.
See who actually understands the payment path, before they leave.
Developers adopt it. Engineering leaders pay for the dashboard.
No, not by default. Teams can make the explanation check required when they're ready.
Usually one or two sentences in the PR thread.
You choose the scope: all PRs, AI-assisted PRs only, or critical paths.
They're Practice mode now: optional and private, for individuals who want them.
[CONFIRM: data handling statement]
No. PRcheck measures pull requests, not people.
We're onboarding teams gradually. Leave your email and we'll reach out when a spot opens.